Bibliography
- F. Ehrle, Der Sentenzenkommentar Peters von Candia, Münster 1925, pp. 51-54
-H. Elie, Le complexe significabile, Paris, Vrin, 1936 [Réédition : Le signifiable par complexe : la proposition et son objet, Paris, Vrin, 2000.], pp. 139-146.
- D. Trapp, “Augustinian Theology of the 14th Century: Notes on Editions, Marginalia, Opinions and Book Lore”, in Augustiniana 6 (1956), pp. 247, 268.
- A. Zumkeller, Manuskripte von Werken der Autoren des Augustiner-Eremitenordens in mitteleuropäischen Bibliotheken, Würzbourg, 1966, p. 205.
- E. Ypma, “Notice sur le ‘Studium’ de Paris au cours de la deuxième moitié du XIVe siècle”, in Augustiniana 17 (1967), pp. 14-36, here 31.
- P. Glorieux, « L’enseignement au moyen Age. Techiniques et methodes en usage à la Faculté de théologie de Paris, au XIIIe siècle », in Archives d’Histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 35 (1968), p. 87.
- G. Nuchelmans, « The Opposition against the Theory of the Complexe Significabile », in Theories of the Proposition, Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity, Amsterdam /London, North-Holland Publishing Company, 1973, pp. 239-240.
-N.G. Gilbert, “Ockham, Wyclif, and the ‘Via Moderna’, in Antiqui und Moderni (Miscellanea Mediaevali, 9) Berlin 1974, pp. 121-122 (about the relation with Petrarca, also discussed by Ehrle).
- C. Schabel The Quarrel with Aureol: Peter Aureol's Role in the late-medieval debate over divine foreknowledge and future contingents, 1315-1475, vol. I (unpublished PhD) University of Iowa 1994, pp. 308-311.
- K. Tachau, « The Quaestiones in primum librum Sententiarum of Andreas de Novocastro, O. F. M. », in Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 59 (1992), pp. 289-318, here pp. 303-307.
- A. Zumkeller, O.S.A., Theology and History of the Augustinian School in the Middle Ages, Augustinian Heritage Institut 1996, p. 48.